Posts Tagged ‘Max Baucus’

December 3, 2009

Health Care News

  • Bookmark and Share

When President Barack Obama made his most recent big health care speech in September, he promised the American people his plan would cost only $900 billion. It took almost three months, but Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) finally produced a bill that CBO was willing to score at $848 billion. Problem is, the bill is filled with so many gimmicks that nobody believes that $848 billion score is the true cost of the bill. And yesterday on the Senate floor, Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) actually admitted it. Watch:

(more…)

Tags: , ,

November 4, 2009

Health Care News

  • Bookmark and Share

A Lewin Group study commissioned by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, finds that although the Baucus health care bill (the legislation that recently passed the Senate Finance Committee) is often touted as the most fiscally responsible of all of Congress’s reform plans, it “relies on certain cost containment approaches that have not worked in the past” and therefore “does not bend the total health care cost curve downward.”

Rather than fundamentally realigning incentives in the health sector to lower the overall cost of care, the Baucus bill imposes top down cuts in payments to medical providers which will only serve to shift costs around the current system. Here are some of the other key findings from the Lewin study on the America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009 (S.1796):

  • Adds to the Deficit. The bill would add to the federal deficit in the first ten years and beyond if it included a permanent “doc fix” to prevent cuts in Medicare payments to physicians under the Sustainable Growth Rate instead of only a one year temporary fix. Every year, Congress defers these reductions in pay to doctors but the bill creates false savings by pretending that Congress would suddenly let these cuts occur. More than $404 billion in savings over the first ten years are attributable to these savings– and reductions in uncompensated care funds for hospitals that treat the uninsured (DSH payments)– that are unlikely to fully materialize. (more…)

Tags: , , , ,

October 29, 2009

Key Documents

  • Bookmark and Share

UPDATED 10/19: Click here for updated legislative language of the Baucus Bill.

NEW 10/19: Click here for the Senate Finance Committee Report.

September 16, 2009 CBO Analysis of Baucus proposal.

September 22, 2009 CBO Analysis of Baucus proposal.

September 22, 2009 Letter to Senator Grassley (R-IA)

September 24, 2009 Scoring Implications of Modifications to the Chairman’s Mark.

October 11, 2009 America’s Health Insurance Plans report on the potential impact the Baucus proposal could have on the cost of private health coverage (conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP).

October 22, 2009: Letter from 13 Dems regarding Medicaid concerns.

Tags: , , , ,

October 27, 2009

Heritage Research

  • Bookmark and Share

On Monday the Senate Finance Committee unveiled the legislative text of S. 1796 — dubbed “America’s Healthy Future Act” — revealing to fans of legislative “bloatware” a new one for the record book!

Not only does this latest entry in the Congress League’s 111th season “monster bill” competition outstrip all other current contenders in the Health Division, it even eclipses the previous all-time division titleholder.paperweight

At a staggering 1,502 pages, the Finance Committee bill dwarfs the Senate HELP Committee’s 839 page bill (S.1679), and is nearly one-and-a-half times the size of this season’s closest divisional competitor, the 1,018 page House “Tri-Committee” bill (H.R. 3200). (more…)

Tags: , , ,

October 23, 2009

Heritage Research

  • Bookmark and Share

Now that the Baucus Plan has been introduced as actual legislative language, it is clear more time is necessary to have a full understanding of the massive 1,500 page bill. As members get the opportunity to read the bill, more problems are likely to emerge on a daily basis.

For example, the Baucus Plan either puts states into fiscal jeopardy or provides another budget gimmick to avoid paying the full cost of the legislation through the treatment of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). The SCHIP provisions have significant budgetary implications for either the federal government or the states. Section 1611 of the Baucus Plan provides a new 23 percentage point increase in the federal funding for SCHIP. That would seem like good news for states. However, under current law, there are no additional appropriations for SCHIP after 2012 and the Baucus Plan does not provide any increased funding. There is a budget cliff in 2013 that will cut federal funds for SCHIP in half.
In scoring the Baucus Plan, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) must assume its current law baseline remains level. (more…)

Tags: , , , ,

October 19, 2009

Health Care News

  • Bookmark and Share

Despite President Obama’s pledge that congressional discussions on health reform legislation would be “televised on C-SPAN, so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or insurance companies,” The Washington Post reports that just three senators are determining the current health debate behind closed doors.

“Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) sits at the head of a wooden table at his office as he and Sens. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) and Max Baucus (D-Mont.) work to merge two competing versions of health-care legislation into one bill,” the Post reports, noting White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel also will be in on the talks, which started on Wednesday and could be completed this week.

The lawmakers will determine whether controversial items in the health legislation, such as a government-run health plan or individual mandates to buy insurance, will be included in a final bill. “This bill is being written in the dark of night,” said House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) in the article, adding that “the president ought to keep his promise to the American people and open this process up.”

Tags: , , , , ,

October 16, 2009

Heritage Research

  • Bookmark and Share

According to the Associated Press, at the direction of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Senate Democrats are plotting to pass a bill, by as early as next week, that grants doctors a $247 billion increase in Medicare fees over a decade. This will no doubt add to the deficit. Why are the Democrats so intent on spending $247 billion in one week? To pave the way for the White House to claim that Obamacare is deficit neutral.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Senate Democratic Leadership are meeting, as you read this, behind closed doors with White House staff . They are trying to cut and paste the complex provisions of the Senate Finance Committee health bill (the Baucus Bill) and the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions bill ( the Kennedy-Dodd bill). They want to produce an overhaul of one sixth of the economy under federal control that is somehow coherent and yet not add “one dime,” as President solemnly promised, to the deficit. (more…)

Tags: , , , , ,

October 16, 2009

Health Care News

  • Bookmark and Share

Leaders in the House and Senate have a secret plan to pass President Barack Obama’s sweeping health care plan without a conference and without any participation by the American people … but that plan that has been pushed to Plan B. The primary plan is to use a secretive conference committee procedure to pass Obamacare by the end of the year.

Yesterday, the Senate Finance Committee passed the outline of a bill, The Vapor Bill, out of committee on a party line vote with the lone crossover Republican support of Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) on a 14-9 vote. AP is reporting that Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) wants to commence debate the last week of October on his version of health care reform. (more…)

Tags: , , , ,

October 12, 2009

Heritage Research

  • Bookmark and Share

The House and Senate are clearly divided over how to pay for the massive new spending commitments the federal government is taking on.

Right now, House and Senate Democrats are meeting behind closed doors to figure out who they will tax and how much they can cut Medicare to meet what will be at least a $1 trillion commitment in new spending. Assuming for just the moment that they can make them match, Congress should look to the example of what Medicaid has done to state budgets.

Medicaid Mess. The commitment to Medicaid has become so large, it acts like a vortex, drawing everything else into itself. Congress should stop and take a good look at what happened to state budgets this past year. The extra federal matching rates for Medicaid came with strings attached—Medicaid eligibility could not be cut. But states still cut Medicaid providers. Medicaid was perhaps spared but that only meant cuts had to be found elsewhere to keep state budgets in balance. Medicaid was protected, but education, public health, mental health services, social services, child welfare programs, and public safety were cut. (more…)

Tags: , ,

October 12, 2009

Health Care News

  • Bookmark and Share

The Congressional Budget Office issued a report giving the Baucus health care bill the stamp of deficit-reduction approval, but this was earned only through steep increases in indirect taxes, such as the coverage mandate. The coverage mandate included in Senator Baucus’ health care plan has significant and disturbing implications for middle-class Americans. Individuals earning up to $45,520 and families earning up to $92,640 would need to cut corners to make ends meet, all in response to the indirect tax implicit in a health care mandate.

For individuals making $34,140 or three times the Federal Poverty Level, the Baucus health care proposal could mandate up to $4,097 in annual premiums, a sum which could have been spent on over nine months of food, almost four months of housing or well over a year of utilities. For a family of four making $69,480 or 300% of poverty, a mandated annual premium of $8,338 would be worth the equivalent of over ten months of food, four months of housing or almost two years of utilities. Is this change to the health care system actual “reform”, or something else? (more…)

Tags: , , , , , ,